Myles Watson wrote: > > > Should I2C devices use objects, since you can't scan for them? > > > > Makes sense. Either way I strongly favor having a policy for this, > > so that the tree is consistent. > > Making it a driver seems easier to enforce/explain since it provides an > *_ops struct.
On the other hand a phony ops struct is bad in so many ways. Less is more, no? //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
