> Myles Watson wrote: > > I'd be interested to see the alternative code. > Fair enough. I have none, It wasn't supposed to be a challenge. Just that I could tell we weren't understanding each other somehow. Pseudo code would have been fine.
> but if it works as an object without ops > then is any more code needed? Ah. There's the point I've been missing in your argument. It works _with_ ops in the object. The ops get linked in to the device tree, so they get used by the correct device even though it can't be discovered. > > Devices that can't be probed for can still have resources that need > > to be read and set and init functions to call. > > Yes, but wouldn't that all need to be done by code with knowledge of > the device (ie. just use static functions in the file) anyway? Yes. The problem is how to call them if you don't have an ops structure somewhere. Thanks, Myles -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
