On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Peter Stuge <[email protected]> wrote:
> Myles Watson wrote: > > > > Should I2C devices use objects, since you can't scan for them? > > > Making it a driver seems easier to enforce/explain since it provides an > > *_ops struct. > > On the other hand a phony ops struct is bad in so many ways. Less is > more, no? > My impression was that the ops struct works fine, but you can't scan for it because I2C is missing the equivalent of PCI vendor/device IDs. In what way is the ops struct phony? Thanks, Myles
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
