On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Juhana Helovuo <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 11:36 -0600, Myles Watson wrote: > >> I was hoping that changing the uma location would be enough to affect the >> rest. >> >> Could you try >> >> if (msr.lo > 0xc0000000) { msr.lo = 0xc0000000; } >> >> I'm thinking that would place uma at 0xb0000000 & coreboot tables at >> 0xafff0000. >> >> Then could you send the log if that's still unstable. >> > > Yes, the placement is exactly as you said. I can't see the conflict. I'll have to think about it.
Marc: Do you have any insight? > This version is very unstable. On most attempts is does not get past > "raminit_amdmct" phase before it starts booting from the start. That's especially interesting because we haven't changed anything that early. > If it gets to the payload, then VGA output is just random pixel noise > and usually there is a spontaneous reboot in a few seconds. Thanks for the info, Myles -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
