Am 03.02.2011 10:14, schrieb Alex G.:
On 02/03/2011 10:17 AM, Josef Kellermann wrote:
e are at it. I'm attaching some very old patch (r2978 ;)
which contains some errata fixes too, if you have some spare time
please try to check if it is correct.
Signed-off-by: Rudolf Marek<[email protected]>
Thanks,
Rudolf
Hi,
are you sure ?
You're right:
AMD Publication #33610, page34
"[Regarding erratum #131]
Systems implementing the workaround for erratum #169 should not apply
this workaround."
So it seems AMD recommends either or, but not both.
Page 59:
"[Regarding erratum #169]
The workaround for this erratum supersedes the workaround for erratum
#131. When implementing
this workaround, the workaround for erratum #131 should not be applied."
So we better implement only 169, and explain in the comments why 131 is
left out.
Alex
Hi,
sorry for the misunderstanding.
Setting bit 32 in msr should be -> 'msr.hi |= (1<< 0)', no?
Josef
--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
