On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Martin Roth <[email protected]> wrote:
> There are a number of issues here: > > > > 3) The way that the microcode is currently being included is (to my > understanding) completely against the Intel licensing. We're compiling a > .h file with a license that says that it *CANNOT* be made GPL into a file > with a GPL header. you're not a lawyer, thank goodness. I'm not either. But can't we solved this problem by putting a bsd header onto that file, rather than going with blobs? Or, better still, talking to intel about the problem, rather than jumping over lots of hurdles to solve a problem that may not exist? ron
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
