Dear Daniel,
Am Freitag, den 03.03.2017, 10:52 +0100 schrieb Daniel Kulesz: > > I think most of the time is spent in RAM initialization. > > > > 1. Do board owners with similar amount of memory (independent of the > > board) have similar numbers? > > 2. What are the ways to improve that? Is it possible? For example, can > > the modules be probed in parallel (if that isn?t done already)? > > Regarding 1: I am running 128GB in 8GB modules (LRDIMMs) and > experiencing a similar issue. With just two UDIMMs, the boot times > are *much* faster. That’s good to hear. Do you have concrete numbers? > Also, the vendor BIOS is faster from the time you press the poweron > button to the time the monitor gets a signal. I believe that’s a design decision in coreboot, that the display can only be initialized after RAM has been initialized. The vendor firmware seems to be able to do it beforehand. (If I am wrong, the vendor firmware is really fast in configuring the memory.) Thanks, Paul PS: Please note, your messages is not threaded correctly, as the mail header fields *In-Reply-To* and References are not set.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
