-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
On 04/28/2018 03:46 PM, ron minnich wrote: Hi Ron, > This is a *personal* opinion, not supported by anyone else I > suppose, but: > > I don't think it's unreasonable to ask that people send in board > status 2 times a year. > > That's it. It makes it easier for potential users, and for people > maintaining the tree. > > Sound ok? Twice a year sounds ok. I still think this should be tied to release cycle, which IMO is not clear at this point. If release cycle would be similar to Linux then I would imagine status update should be sent at - -rcX stage and then after stable release. We will see how status board update will evolve. Best Regards, - -- Piotr Król Embedded Systems Consultant https://3mdeb.com | @3mdeb_com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE4DCbLYWmfoRjKeNLsu5x6WeqnkwFAlrp3ugACgkQsu5x6Weq nkx91g//VLm56h+3QoZS7uF8UPXTWbCH5EO7iFOZynQQoyAYzkm7uTNdLxNYfYmR O21EJ5YcW/V3EdT/QrbgnSdlXX3MSHO+ZlwJsQWHBKTHF6+oprSQmaG4WcQ2y4GI yFg0wAj+5avz18HXE9rC6M+Hq6SYgcxBqCMsNi8p0DZxutpnb9uwyRIT6wPRDo6u Ik2tMeG7qKU0e6sXHEp920Tk7rtcWXCwQvrJRYj4td7LbI26a09VvT6MZjqjw21J MNiiKo1kgjlba2xMQtg/FUYSVNMkEfWvNcnDWiHF5cuubmOV/Xb5ePvNS5S6dcaT vvp7OYQqdVc3wXB/c1PUKP+X6jcM0ymqT3n484bX4Kk6aJy+t7IL/BBBwV8jtnuz 1mO+jKJ3c8GkpUv7JuvsvTpky9V1bDgScjvMoOhu6/WjAX5ml8urBhc7ceXSvz71 2PgPLwrEx868fV7J6HpRw4nlTYcOt2GB6cQU0aVMFEERqu+kbe7KvTwb3JWTPiBW vuy7IOOPEf0OMKDvL/QGVQ/njp9+JS+GEO1rNvQnvtg0EDYrScQJNB5VaAA7Y7Il 7K+GDM83Lj9dGnDw9/xYWzCzInFBtM3c6mB9rsqJBOKAWz5PkR2Br4wVZj5ptLgI PhPtxM6DJne8okvwQnGAza5RBrzU+F79PupJleiVCYzPxXBMlU8= =5CyK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
