On 02.05.2018 18:06, Piotr Król wrote: > On 04/28/2018 03:48 PM, Nico Huber wrote: >> On 28.04.2018 15:16, Piotr Król wrote: >>> Second thing that IMO is problematic in board status is >>> assumption that system have to boot with vanilla coreboot. This >>> is problematic when you have to use customized version of SeaBIOS >>> or any other payload used for booting system. >> >> The payload doesn't matter. Only thing we'd care about is the >> coreboot revision that should be vanilla. Actually board status >> currently accepts any revision and rules weren't discussed, yet >> (another point why I don't think anything will happen because of >> missing board-status uploads). > > If your payload version/repository is different you have to modify > Makefile to build bootable coreboot.rom then you will get dirty tree.
I don't see that. You can always build your payload separately and add it with CONFIG_PAYLOAD_ELF. > > If policy was not discussed, then I do not understand hype related to > boards removal. What I tried to say more subtly earlier, the hype is pure bullshit. Nico -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
