On 02.05.2018 17:53, Piotr Król wrote: > On 04/28/2018 03:46 PM, ron minnich wrote: >> This is a *personal* opinion, not supported by anyone else I >> suppose, but: >> >> I don't think it's unreasonable to ask that people send in board >> status 2 times a year. >> >> That's it. It makes it easier for potential users, and for people >> maintaining the tree. >> >> Sound ok? > > Twice a year sounds ok. I still think this should be tied to release > cycle, which IMO is not clear at this point. If release cycle would be > similar to Linux then I would imagine status update should be sent at > - -rcX stage and then after stable release.
Removing boards from the master branch happened right after releases before. coreboot releases are not "stable" btw. more reference points. Related: coreboot desperately needs a release manager. We had a 6 month release cycle, IIRC. I guess the last has been due in April, but nobody talked about it yet. Neither have we published the release notes of the 4.7 release [1], afaics. Nico [1] https://pads.ccc.de/s7c2eXetAu -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
