On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 5:42 PM R S <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 6:46 AM Paul Menzel <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> PS: By the way, Memtest86+ 5.31b was released [2]. >> >> [1]: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32613 >> [2]: https://www.memtest.org/ > > > That's huge! Thanks for picking up development. > > -- > LAN Engineer * NOC and IT Infrastructure Maintenance > BCS Technology Department * Network Group > ComicSans Awareness Campaign > _______________________________________________ > coreboot mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Would like to add 2 notes: 1) Recently I've discovered that you could build a coreboot's "5.01 002" memtest86+ fork as a floppy instead of payload (and then manually add a floppy to a coreboot BIOS build) 2) A good way to double check is to also use a Passmark's memtest86 4.37 floppy. If you're getting the same results, means that maybe a RAM is faulty; if the different results - maybea false positive. Thank you for telling about a new memtest86+, nice to see it active again. I'd inform the developer about coreboot's fork and some other forks, so that he could merge them into a one great memtest. _______________________________________________ coreboot mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
