Forwarded message from Archna below ---------- Forwarded message --------- Von: Archna Bhatia <[email protected]> Date: Do., 9. Feb. 2023 um 19:58 Uhr Subject: Re: [Corpora-List] Deadline extension: 19th Workshop on Multiword Expressions (MWE 2023) To: Ada Wan <[email protected]>, kilian Evang <[email protected]> Cc: Mike Scott <[email protected]>, [email protected] < [email protected]>, [email protected] < [email protected]>
Thanks, Ada. I think using the terms “fixed” and “idiomatic” make the category appear more restrictive, and would need qualifications such as “fixed” is a relative term here, etc. With “multiwords/multiword expressions” also, there are stipulations (the notion of wordhood may not be applicable to every single language and in the same way) but since the term has been used for a long while, there is a bit of a shared understanding of this term, including about these stipulations. I am open to better terminology. Using just “expressions”, however, seems too vague and loses some generalizations about the idiosyncrasies that "multiword expressions” demonstrate. Every expression in not the same, “multiword expressions” show characteristics different from other expressions. I understand there is some fluidity also there when trying to distinguish between multiwords and non multiword expressions. There are so many angles that one could look at language from. I don’t see anything wrong with the view that studies expressions covering all aspects as you suggest without distinguishing between expressions based on notions of wordhood. The task you suggest will help in developing understanding about language and how languages are similar or different and how they are used. I don’t think it disqualifies efforts that distinguish between “multiword expressions” and non-multiword expressions though, and the idiosyncrasies are not limited to morphology/syntax, idiosyncrasies are found in other linguistic aspects too when characterizing "multiword expressions”. ~ Archna On Feb 9, 2023, at 11:17 AM, Ada Wan <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Archna, hi Kilian, hi all Thanks for your replies. TLDR on my part: I'd be fine going with "expressions" (instead of "fixed/idiomatic expressions"). Neither "word" nor "morphology/syntax" (apart from the ordering of elements and/or sequential patterns) is necessary in the analyses of such. ----- More specifically: [@Archna] Re "fixed/idiomatic expressions": I don't think it matters much whether they are "fixed" or "idiomatic". A "fixed expression" is one that is usually more impervious to (lexical) change. One can measure this quality in a longitudinal study, e.g. in relation to other aspects of language change etc.. Re how "fixed" is "fixed": it's relative, much like many other aspects of language studies. By "idiomatic", one could mean that there is an element of idiosyncrasy (as "idiom"/"idioma"). The message that I am trying to get across is that "word" is a superflous category in the study of language. Would you mind please justifying why you need "words"? The same goes for morphology, actually. In essence, morphological analyses involve selective decomposition, not decomposition of all decomposable units. Hence if one is only accounting for variations within an expression as a ((sub-)character) sequence involving "morphemes" (assuming definable rigorously) and discounting the changes in other parts of the sequence, that would be an incomplete analysis of the expression. Instead, one can just refer to expressions as "expressions", as e.g. sequences/strings of various lengths/vocabs in (sub-)characters --- such an account is also more flexible and accommodating to diverse languages/registers/modalities. A study of "expressions" can cover all other aspects --- not just lexical but also functional ones. One doesn't need to incorporate/impose any ad hoc notions of "wordhood" in these studies. Suggestion: I believe there are many more interesting tasks in this area, instead of trying to find/define "words" within expressions, or to "parse" them according to some structuralist assumptions (i.e. morphologically/syntactically). For example, the community could start (some multi-year project) building an international multilingual parallel (note: not everything would be parallelizable) database of all expressions and terminologies ever existed with contextual (historical/cultural/social) information and start verifying their sources and status of current use. (Just be aware, though, that one is not reinforcing values that shouldn't be further emphasized / transfered to posterity --- as an ethical consideration. So if something is in the grey area now, document clearly what the current attitudes towards a certain value are, so posterity can look back and evaluate with respect to their point of view.) Counter questions to Archna: What are the motivations behind your suggestion to access/interpret language using "words"? How do you define "words" and justify the sufficiency/necessity of morphology/syntax in relation to the study of these expressions, esp. when the morphological decomposition of these expressions is arbitrary and helps little (or not at all) with explanation or prediction? Re "complex lexical terms", @Kilian: I'm just wondering what kind of terms that would be considered "terms" that wouldn't be considered lexical (I was tempted to add "lexical" to "expressions" as well, but thought that might be a bit redundant)? It depends on how one defines "terms", of course. And how "complex" are expressions really? They are just more calcified units after all, aren't they? (Why do we/some always seem to want to add the term "complex" to everything? Things that aren't "complex" are also worthy of studying!) Curious what you think... Thanks and best Ada Why I'm advocating #noWords: Fairness in Representation for Multilingual NLP: Insights from Controlled Experiments on Conditional Language Modeling https://openreview.net/forum?id=-llS6TiOew <https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fopenreview.net%2Fforum%3Fid%3D-llS6TiOew&data=05%7C01%7Cabhatia%40ihmc.org%7C3d437044e42f42c2c61408db0ab92ccb%7C2b38115bebad4aba9ea3b3779d8f4f43%7C1%7C0%7C638115562691707319%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=jea7YNI7295cJ2CY0jwxrsjID7DcDqerqI3IQxj9hUc%3D&reserved=0> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eKbhdZkPJ0HgU1RsGXGFBPGameWIVdt9/view <https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdrive.google.com%2Ffile%2Fd%2F1eKbhdZkPJ0HgU1RsGXGFBPGameWIVdt9%2Fview&data=05%7C01%7Cabhatia%40ihmc.org%7C3d437044e42f42c2c61408db0ab92ccb%7C2b38115bebad4aba9ea3b3779d8f4f43%7C1%7C0%7C638115562691707319%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ZZ%2F8v%2FsH6RRAlIxLYsG1tYvFOFaTZFzVtCfvsQ8ZcuY%3D&reserved=0> (It took me a while for everything to sink in.) On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 3:27 PM Mike Scott via Corpora < [email protected]> wrote: > I must say I'm perfectly happy with "multi-word expression", or > "multi-word unit". > > I feel sympathy with Archna's post (and incidentally wish Archna didn't > have to go through a friend!) > Cheers -- Mike > > -- > > Mike Scottlexically.net > <https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flexically.net%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cabhatia%40ihmc.org%7C3d437044e42f42c2c61408db0ab92ccb%7C2b38115bebad4aba9ea3b3779d8f4f43%7C1%7C0%7C638115562691707319%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=lnpEPfv%2B4UmB1e0xVkC4hsIs%2B9GqwDnSzzMpwiFWZHw%3D&reserved=0> > Lexical Analysis Software and Aston University > > _______________________________________________ > Corpora mailing list -- [email protected] > https://list.elra.info/mailman3/postorius/lists/corpora.list.elra.info/ > <https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flist.elra.info%2Fmailman3%2Fpostorius%2Flists%2Fcorpora.list.elra.info%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cabhatia%40ihmc.org%7C3d437044e42f42c2c61408db0ab92ccb%7C2b38115bebad4aba9ea3b3779d8f4f43%7C1%7C0%7C638115562691707319%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=78A%2BL24tQ0GBhZ3lAGipq9tLPZU%2FmydmGBGX1yE4BSA%3D&reserved=0> > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MWE Workshop 2023 Organizers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mweworkshop2023/CAB7Mis_GSyFjZOVw_XWp431VMJJBo0BnPqjFsqqTP_sEE58Ezw%40mail.gmail.com <https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgroups.google.com%2Fd%2Fmsgid%2Fmweworkshop2023%2FCAB7Mis_GSyFjZOVw_XWp431VMJJBo0BnPqjFsqqTP_sEE58Ezw%2540mail.gmail.com%3Futm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dfooter&data=05%7C01%7Cabhatia%40ihmc.org%7C3d437044e42f42c2c61408db0ab92ccb%7C2b38115bebad4aba9ea3b3779d8f4f43%7C1%7C0%7C638115562691707319%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FX%2BoXH1j9XL5X0tJuqc%2BfKdFkuugawZvrtzdXNUG2%2FA%3D&reserved=0> . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout <https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgroups.google.com%2Fd%2Foptout&data=05%7C01%7Cabhatia%40ihmc.org%7C3d437044e42f42c2c61408db0ab92ccb%7C2b38115bebad4aba9ea3b3779d8f4f43%7C1%7C0%7C638115562691707319%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=1SGOAvFNmKwsKKOx6Kc%2Fm1wHzDbm%2F4xiEge3RY5etrE%3D&reserved=0> . -- Archna Bhatia, Ph.D. Research Scientist, Institute for Human & Machine Cognition 15 SE Osceola Ave, Ocala, FL 34471 (352) 387-3061
_______________________________________________ Corpora mailing list -- [email protected] https://list.elra.info/mailman3/postorius/lists/corpora.list.elra.info/ To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
