Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-cose-x509-07: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-x509/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I think the topic should be fairly easily to resolve one way or another. However, even after having read the reply to Marin's comment I don't think this document is published with the right status. - The document defines new CBOR attributes, that is standard track work as it comes out as consensus document from a IETF WG. - It does not define or document crypto algorithm just refer to existing ones. - The charter item might have been reasonable as informational if existing attributes could have been used. With the choice to define new attributes I think this has entered standards track. - The status of the document I think will also affect the value that IANA might assign to these COSE Header Parameters. If there are additional considerations I am happy to learn about them. Else, I would propose a change of status to proposed standard and redo the IETF last call. _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
