Hello Magnus,

Thank you for your review and apologies for the delay! I have changed the
document status as you requested. The change could be seen in commitdf4c50d
<https://github.com/cose-wg/X509/commit/df4c50d312e0a0f243130ab779ecb992f9f80a8e>
.
I have some technical difficulties and after they are resolved, I will
upload a new version of the draft. After that I will work with Barry Leiba
to have the new IETF last call.

Best regards,
Ivaylo


On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 2:18 PM Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-cose-x509-07: Discuss
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-x509/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I think the topic should be fairly easily to resolve one way or another.
> However, even after having read the reply to Marin's comment I don't think
> this
> document is published with the right status.
>
> - The document defines new CBOR attributes, that is standard track work as
> it
> comes out as consensus document from a IETF WG. - It does not define or
> document crypto algorithm just refer to existing ones. - The charter item
> might
> have been reasonable as informational if existing attributes could have
> been
> used. With the choice to define new attributes I think this has entered
> standards track. - The status of the document I think will also affect the
> value that IANA might assign to these COSE Header Parameters.
>
> If there are additional considerations I am happy to learn about them.
>
> Else, I would propose a change of status to proposed standard and redo the
> IETF
> last call.
>
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
COSE mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose

Reply via email to