We had a good discussion on key / cert identification for EAT / RATS at our virtual interim meeting today. There seems to be consensus support for use of cose-x509.
LL > On Oct 22, 2020, at 11:17 AM, Laurence Lundblade <l...@island-resort.com> > wrote: > > I would like to see it as standards track. > > I would like EAT / RATS to make normative reference to it. Some forms of > Attestation use Endorsements to convey a signature verification key to the > Verifier and some Endorsements are in the form of an X.509 certificate. > > I will present some of this at the RATS virtual interim tomorrow > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-interim-2020-rats-06-rats-01/>. > Slides are here > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/slides-interim-2020-rats-06-sessa-eat-verification-id-and-other-updates/>. > This is why I’ve been so interested in this lately. > > Also, it seems pretty important for COSE to be usable with the all the X.509 > infrastructure out there. > > LL > > >> On Oct 22, 2020, at 5:18 AM, Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker >> <nore...@ietf.org <mailto:nore...@ietf.org>> wrote: >> >> ... >> I think the topic should be fairly easily to resolve one way or another. >> However, even after having read the reply to Marin's comment I don't think >> this >> document is published with the right status. >> >> - The document defines new CBOR attributes, that is standard track work as it >> comes out as consensus document from a IETF WG. - It does not define or >> document crypto algorithm just refer to existing ones. - The charter item >> might >> have been reasonable as informational if existing attributes could have been >> used. With the choice to define new attributes I think this has entered >> standards track. - The status of the document I think will also affect the >> value that IANA might assign to these COSE Header Parameters. >> >> If there are additional considerations I am happy to learn about them. >> >> Else, I would propose a change of status to proposed standard and redo the >> IETF >> last call. >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> COSE mailing list >> COSE@ietf.org <mailto:COSE@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose >> > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > COSE@ietf.org <mailto:COSE@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose>
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list COSE@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
