On 17. Dec 2021, at 22:46, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Laurence Lundblade <[email protected]> wrote: >> So the question is: where should the CDDL for a CWT go? Here’s the main >> options I can think of: >> - EAT >> - UCCS >> - CWTbis (a revision of CWT to include CDDL) >> - Some other new standard >> - no where, never create it > > I'd say that it should go into RFC8152bis. (bis-bis. There is another german > term here).
?? > It's still in AUTH48 right now. Maybe an appeal to put it in > could occur in cose@ > > If it too late for that, then in an errata, or another document. There is no errata. There is a missing feature — making it easy to interact with the COSE specification via CDDL. Missing features are addressed in new documents, not in AUTH48. Certainly not in AUTH48 if there is considerable leeway for designing it and nothing in the original document depends on it. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
