Hi!
I was unaware that the authors/editors have a say in a WGLC, sorry. As
an editor and contributor of this I-D, I support moving it in. I think
the TTC vs CTT models have never been illustrated well and while it
might be obvious to some, it is useful to be able to point to those now,
too.
Additionally, Leonard might have also have an opinion about the WGLC.
Viele Grüße,
Henk
On 13.08.24 18:47, Michael Jones wrote:
Ivo and I reviewed the results of the WGLC and there have been no
responses whatsoever – even from the authors. We are therefore
extending the WGLC for another two weeks until Tuesday, August 27^th .
Unless multiple people support progressing the draft, we will not
request publication.
Please send your reviews and feedback on the draft.
Thank you,
-- Mike
and Ivo
*From:* Michael Jones <[email protected]>
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 30, 2024 10:53 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* [COSE] WGLC for draft-ietf-cose-tsa-tst-header-parameter
Hi all,
This message starts the Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cose-tsa-tst-header-parameter-02.html <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cose-tsa-tst-header-parameter-02.html>. The WGLC will run for two weeks, ending on Tuesday, August 13, 2024.
Please review and send any comments or feedback to the working group.
Even if your feedback is “this is ready for publication”, please let
us know.
Thank you,
-- Mike and Ivaylo, COSE Chairs
_______________________________________________
COSE mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
COSE mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
