Robert Moskowitz <[email protected]> wrote: > All that I am working with in aviation are using #1.
And, I'm all for that.
I'm complaining that #2 will get in the way of making #3 real.
Goran says that he has deployed products using #2, and I'd like to know more.
They must be completely private, because no public CAs are going doing #2 today.
>> There are 3 variants:
>>
>> 1. Compressed x509
>> 2. Compressed x509 data model signed with COSE.
>> 3. COSE data model achieving same use case
I want to write an I-D on a CBOR version of fullcmc and CSR-attributes for #1
and for #3.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
