Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: > On 19. Mar 2025, at 08:23, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'm complaining that #2 will get in the way of making #3 real.
> Ah, the transition dilemma.
> Offer a transition aid and users will become addicted to it.
Yes, this is the concern.
> I think the upside of #2 way, way, outweighs this.
Is the upside that a device can avoid doing any ASN.1/DER parsing, since it
never has to turn the CBOR back into DER to check the signature.
But is that even true? If a certificate has something we do not compress, or
deep in the structure, then the ASN.1 will still be there, right? I guess we
can avoid ever creating such things for #2 (native signed).
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
