Orie Steele <[email protected]> wrote: > Similar to how c509 doesn't specify a complete bi-directional lossless > mapping for all things an x509 cert can include, there will be differences > in what "Native COSE" and "Pure COSE" can do and how they do it...
> Btw, I don't love either of these terms "Native or Pure"... Sorry I don't
> have anything better to offer...
I think we should call it DER-signed and COSE-signed.
I am pleased to hear that there are CA interested in COSE-signed.
But I am dismayed that multiple people spoke up in favour of COSE-signed who
were in fact talking about DER-signed.
I believe it will get in the way of COSE-based cnf-PKI.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
