On Sun, 13 Apr 2025 16:16:10 +0200 Anders Rundgren <[email protected]> wrote:
> That CBOR simple types lexicographically come after numeric and alphanumeric > labels is also an advantage. Always in the same place (last). That's not true for generic encoder. > So rather than making simple(59) a specific SD-CWT item, it could be a > general purpose label. What to call it? I leave that to the bikeshed > builders :) +1 to general purpose. And same position for tags (say, less than 32768) - better to have more generic than to registrate different new for any particular case. -- WBR, @nuclight _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
