On Sun, 13 Apr 2025 07:37:24 -0700 Rohan Mahy <[email protected]> wrote:
> Using a simple type makes sense for the purpose you describe, but it should > be a different value. The semantics of simple(59) is that an array of > redacted key claims from the same level of hierarchy follows. > > I'm guessing your simple type (call it simple(42)) means that a map follows > containing an enveloped signature and its parameters, which covers > everything in the payload except the simple(42) key. Let's leave simple(42) for documentation purposes (like "example.org"). Just my 1$ bikeshed :) -- WBR, @nuclight _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
