Hi Derek, Do you also approve the COSE Key Type and COSE Key Type Parameter registrations in Sections 8.1.2 and 8.1.5?
Please note that since the above registries are expert review registries, the RFC 7120 early allocation process does not apply here. Once we receive your approval, we'd proceed with a permanent registration. Thanks, Sabrina On Wed Apr 23 20:35:04 2025, [email protected] wrote: > Mike, > > As one of the designated experts, I am fine with early registration of > ML-DSA. > > As a group participant, I would ask if there is any interest in early > registration for ML-KEM as well? > > -derek > > On Wed, April 23, 2025 4:20 pm, Michael Jones wrote: > > The reason for omitting the private key registrations at this time is > > that > > that their representations are still being debated, in a discussion > > including both the COSE and LAMPS working groups. See the thread > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/9F54S32Xgn_zOdU_oFjnXQta- > > nE/ > > (which I need to reinvigorate to try to drive it to a conclusion). > > > > Wearing my COSE chair hat, I didn't request registration of the > > values > > that might change. That said, it's very useful for people to be able > > to > > start implementing using the ML-DSA public key representations. > > > > -- Mike > > > > From: Filip Skokan <[email protected]> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2025 12:57 PM > > To: Michael Jones <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Deb > > Cooley > > <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [COSE] Request for early allocation of values defined in > > draft-ietf-cose-dilithium > > > > (JOSE review) > > > > The "alg" values (section-8.1.7) are good to go. > > > > An early allocation just for the JWK "kty" value and "pub" parameter > > (Given the request to omit "priv"and "seed" from section-8.1.8) would > > make > > an incomplete JWK representation and would in my opinion diminish the > > value of such allocation. Thoughts? > > > > S pozdravem, > > Filip Skokan > > > > > > On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 23:16, Michael Jones > > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > > wrote: > > Dear IANA, > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-dilithium/ defines > > identifiers needed for interoperable use of the post-quantum ML-DSA > > signature algorithm defined by NIST. Implementers are waiting on the > > code > > point allocations in this draft to be able to produce interoperable > > implementations using this algorithm. The draft has completed WGLC > > and > > publication has been requested. > > > > I am writing as a COSE working group chair requesting that early > > allocation be performed for these values defined by the > > specification: > > All values defined in the IANA Considerations section at > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cose-dilithium- > > 06.html#name-iana-considerations > > EXCEPT FOR the private key and seed values in Sections 8.1.4, 8.1.6, > > 8.1.9.1, and 8.1.9.3. (The private key and seed representations are > > still > > being discussed in coordination with the Lamps working group, and may > > change.) > > > > This action has support from both COSE chairs (Ivo and Mike) and the > > COSE > > area director (Paul). > > > > Thank you, > > -- Mike > > > > _______________________________________________ > > COSE mailing list -- [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > To unsubscribe send an email to > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > _______________________________________________ > > COSE mailing list -- [email protected] > > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
