(JOSE review) The "alg" values (section-8.1.7) are good to go.
An early allocation just for the JWK "kty" value and "pub" parameter (Given the request to omit "priv"and "seed" from section-8.1.8) would make an incomplete JWK representation and would in my opinion diminish the value of such allocation. Thoughts? S pozdravem, *Filip Skokan* On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 23:16, Michael Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear IANA, > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-dilithium/ defines > identifiers needed for interoperable use of the post-quantum ML-DSA > signature algorithm defined by NIST. Implementers are waiting on the code > point allocations in this draft to be able to produce interoperable > implementations using this algorithm. The draft has completed WGLC and > publication has been requested. > > > > I am writing as a COSE working group chair requesting that early > allocation be performed for these values defined by the specification: All > values defined in the IANA Considerations section at > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cose-dilithium-06.html#name-iana-considerations > EXCEPT FOR the private key and seed values in Sections 8.1.4, 8.1.6, > 8.1.9.1, and 8.1.9.3. (The private key and seed representations are still > being discussed in coordination with the Lamps working group, and may > change.) > > > > This action has support from both COSE chairs (Ivo and Mike) and the COSE > area director (Paul). > > > > Thank you, > > -- Mike > > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
