I have raised https://github.com/cose-wg/draft-ietf-cose-sphincs-plus/pull/18
I will wait to hear from Rafael, since this PR adjusted his email and employer information. Regards, OS On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 3:08 PM Ivaylo Petrov <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear authors, > > While preparing the shepherd write-up, I came across the following > questions and nits for the document (chair hat off): > > 1. Shouldn't there be a normative reference to the definition of > base64url, which is currently used in section 5 without a definition? > 2. Again in section 5, is there the possibility for confusion between > empty string and nil string? If so, please emphasize it. > 3. Abstract is too short according to recommendations in > https://authors.ietf.org/required-content#abstract. I am fine with it, > but please consider whether some extra information might be useful there. > 4. One of the author’s emails is obsolete as they were using their > employer’s email (they told me that we can use [email protected]), which > does not match https://authors.ietf.org/required-content#authors-addresses > recommendations. That is still the case for half of the people, so please > consider updating your emails if they might not be stable over the longer > term. > > Once I receive the reply/update regarding these points, I will update my > shepherd write-up if necessary and send the draft for publication. > > Thanks, > Ivo >
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
