https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-sphincs-plus/10/
Has been posted addressing this review. OS On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 12:02 PM Orie <[email protected]> wrote: > I have raised > https://github.com/cose-wg/draft-ietf-cose-sphincs-plus/pull/18 > > I will wait to hear from Rafael, since this PR adjusted his email and > employer information. > > Regards, > > OS > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 3:08 PM Ivaylo Petrov <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Dear authors, >> >> While preparing the shepherd write-up, I came across the following >> questions and nits for the document (chair hat off): >> >> 1. Shouldn't there be a normative reference to the definition of >> base64url, which is currently used in section 5 without a definition? >> 2. Again in section 5, is there the possibility for confusion between >> empty string and nil string? If so, please emphasize it. >> 3. Abstract is too short according to recommendations in >> https://authors.ietf.org/required-content#abstract. I am fine with it, >> but please consider whether some extra information might be useful there. >> 4. One of the author’s emails is obsolete as they were using their >> employer’s email (they told me that we can use [email protected]), which >> does not match >> https://authors.ietf.org/required-content#authors-addresses >> recommendations. That is still the case for half of the people, so please >> consider updating your emails if they might not be stable over the longer >> term. >> >> Once I receive the reply/update regarding these points, I will update my >> shepherd write-up if necessary and send the draft for publication. >> >> Thanks, >> Ivo >> >
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
