Thank you Elwyn.  Absolutely fascinating.
Dorothy 

Sent from my iPad

> On 22/06/2020, at 5:56 AM, elwyn soutter via CoTyroneList 
> <cotyronelist@cotyroneireland.com> wrote:
> 
> Marion,
> 
> 
> 
> I suspect that a full answer to your interesting question could fill a
> hundred pages.
> 
> 
> 
> One source you might want to investigate is: “The Population of Ireland
> 1750 – 1845” by KH Connell, published in Oxford 1950. One of the many
> causes of the problems that plagued Ireland in the 1800s was the fact that
> there had been a massive population explosion. It went up from 3 million in
> 1741 to 8 million in 1841. (It’s only 6 million today).  No-one is entirely
> certain why. A reduction in neo-natal death rates was a factor. Connell
> also speculates that they started to marry younger and that consequently
> the reproductive rate ( R ) increased significantly. And as we all know
> these days, if the R number rises significantly you can see an exponential
> increase in whatever you are studying. In this case, children.
> 
> 
> 
> The book therefore spends quite a bit of time discussing the customs
> surrounding marriage, and also different customs between Catholics and
> Protestants.  There’s some interesting but grim stuff about arranged
> marriages in the West of Ireland, with girls being dragged to the altar by
> their fathers, bathed in tears, to marry men they hadn’t a notion for. “The
> Chief time for marriages is from Christmas until Lent, being the season of
> the year when people have the most leisure for settling such business.”
> (page 55).
> 
> 
> 
> But not all marriages were arranged. Couples mostly seemed to select each
> other in the ways we would recognise today. Another factor was that
> marriage was the only thing they could look to, to break the miserableness
> of their existence. “Perhaps the strongest motives urging young people
> towards early marriages were the wretchedness of their living conditions
> and their realization that no ordinary amount of self-denial or industry
> gave promise of better times. Contemporaries frequently regarded early
> marriage as one of the evils of poor living conditions.” (p57).
> 
> 
> 
> Anyway, as I say, that study contains quite a bit on marriage customs.
> 
> 
> 
> Some couples eloped (if they had the means). For years the main ferry
> between Scotland and the Belfast area was between Portpatrick in
> Wigtownshire and Donaghadee in Co. Down.  So couples eloped to Portpatrick
> to get married. Scottish law then (and now) allows a couple to marry at 16,
> and without parental consent.  (In England and Ireland parental consent was
> required till you were 21). Some folk may have heard of people running off
> to Gretna Green to get married. Gretna Green is on the border between
> England & Scotland and so was handy if you were English and in a hurry to
> get married, but Portpatrick was the equivalent if coming from Ireland.
> Here’s a link to marriages in Portpatrick involving couples from Ireland,
> going back to 1721. Most of these are presumably elopements. I can’t think
> of any other reason for marrying there:
> 
> 
> 
> http://www.ulsterancestry.com/free/ShowFreePage-39.html#gsc.tab=0
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The Ulster-Scots are an interesting group.  I did a course at Queens
> University, Belfast a year or two back on migration into Ireland. The
> lecturer drew a contrast between various invaders such as the Vikings and
> the Ulster – Scots.  In spite of being present for 300 years or so, the
> Vikings left very little impact on Ireland. There’s a few place names such
> as Strangford (strong fjord) and the odd surname which may point to Norse
> origins, but by and large there’s not much sign of them. Part of the reason
> was that they only settled around the coast, and not in sufficient numbers
> to dominate the population. But another factor was that they didn’t bring
> any women with them.  If they needed women then the answer was usually a
> bit of rape and pillage amongst the locals. However the significance of
> this was that if they settled and remained in Ireland, as some undoubtedly
> did, then they quickly integrated into the local community and their Norse
> identity was soon lost. In contrast, the Scots came with equal numbers of
> men and women.  They tended to marry each other and kept their separate
> identity.  They often looked down on the native Irish and on Catholicism
> which was the denomination that most had fought to get rid of in Scotland
> in the 1500s, so that limited the tendency for inter-marriage, though for
> all that there were plenty of mixed marriages. But overall the Ulster –
> Scots, a high percentage of whom were Presbyterian tended to marry each
> other.  (There were Scots Catholics and Episcopalians who settled in
> Ireland too, but the majority were Presbyterian). This tendency can be
> found in Ireland even today and in part accounts for the separate identity
> that many in Ulster still feel, which is why they often identify as Ulster-
> Scots, rather than Irish.
> 
> 
> 
> You ask about illegitimacy and the churches attitude.  There was plenty of
> illegitimacy around. One study I read suggested that about 1% of births
> were illegitimate in the mid 1800s. There were local exceptions especially
> if there was a workhouse in the area, and workhouse births distorted the
> figures:
> 
> 
> 
> http://www.historyireland.com/18th-19th-century-history/a-sexual-revolution-in-the-west-of-ireland/
> 
> 
> 
> Before the Poor Law was introduced c 1840, the churches were responsible
> for supporting the poor in their congregations. Consequently they took a
> great interest in illegitimate children because they might have to support
> them financially. Presbyterians usually called a woman with an illegitimate
> child up before the Kirk Session and asked her who the father was. If she
> revealed that, he too was summoned and interviewed.  He was put under
> pressure to support the child, and to marry the woman if she was willing.  
> They
> had to admit their sins in front of the congregation (ante-nuptial
> fornication), and were denied Communion for a while. Sometimes they had to
> sit separately from the rest of the congregation.  Records of these
> examinations can be found in the Kirk Session minutes where they survive.
> (Usually in PRONI). Other denominations also pursued errant fathers though
> – in my opinion - not always with the same determination as Presbyterians.
> 
> 
> 
> You can spot some illegitimate children in the 1901 & 1911 censuses where
> they have been “adopted” by the grandparents.  They appear as the apparent
> extra son or daughter of a woman in her 60s, so the family were evidently
> often doing their best to reduce the stigma.
> 
> 
> 
> In my own family I have an ancestor who had 2 illegitimate children over a
> 3 year period around 1825. The Kirk Session minutes show that the alleged
> father readily agreed he was the father of the first and paid up, but he
> said he was not the father of the second and refused to pay, so the church
> paid for that child for a while. Eventually 1 child died. Then the mother
> was arrested for burglary and theft. (She stole a bundle of clothes because
> she was living rough and destitute). She was taken into custody and
> eventually transported. Her remaining son was looked after by her married
> sister. So the family sort of rallied round in some cases, I would say.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Elwyn
> 
> On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 at 13:11, Marion via CoTyroneList <
> cotyronelist@cotyroneireland.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hello all,
>> I wonder if anyone can tell me or suggest where I might find out about
>> marriage customs in nineteenth century Ireland, particularly amongst Ulster
>> Scots. Were they based on social, cultural or religious factors ? Did the
>> bride and groom have much input ? Were protestant and Roman Catholic
>> approaches very different?
>> Also what were the attitudes to illegitimacy by family members and society
>> at large? How were the mothers and children treated ?
>> Thank you in advance for your help !
>> Regards Marion Shephard
>> 
>> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> CoTyroneList Mailing List
>> Mailing List Email Address: CoTyroneList@cotyroneireland.com
>> Change Your Preferences:
>> http://cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.com
>> Mailing List Archive: https://goo.gl/mQCKrY
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> CoTyroneList Mailing List
> Mailing List Email Address: CoTyroneList@cotyroneireland.com
> Change Your Preferences: 
> http://cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.com
> Mailing List Archive: https://goo.gl/mQCKrY

_______________________________________________
CoTyroneList Mailing List
Mailing List Email Address: CoTyroneList@cotyroneireland.com
Change Your Preferences: 
http://cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.com
Mailing List Archive: https://goo.gl/mQCKrY

Reply via email to