Steve, When Fred Weick was asked about the safety of the  fuel system, he
pointed out thet he had made a very thouough study of airplane crashes,
due to
engine stoppage...and found out the most occured due to fuel starvation,
valves turned off, pump failure, etc. His conclusion was ( and I concur)
that
the header tank made more sense than depending on a fuel pump to supply
the
engine with fuel. 

Now in order to have more than an hour of flying, the wing tanks were
added ,
with a pump to refil the header.He cross fed without a valve so as to keep
the
airplane in lateral balance, and to prevent a failure from a turned off
valve....

The fule pump is quite dependable -if the AI doesn't forget to tighten the
cover when performing the annual inspection. Yes the disphragm can fail -
and
will eventually will, I guess. 

Easy to change out the quick drain o rings, - just put a tapered plug in
the
hole where the valve is screwed in. Sure you spill a little 100 ll, but
with
practice its only about 1/2 cup or so...


Electric pumps are more likely to fail, in my opinion...they require
elkectricity to operate, plus the other potential problems with a
mechanical
pump - diaphragm, vcheck valves, hoses, etc.

Good idea to replace the old hoses and cover them , etc.......but would be
same with electric or mechanical.

Only down side I see is a leaking cowl tank.... Than can be a problem, but
if
maintained properly and repaired when necessary, then I think its the best
solution...

One might enclose the cowl tank with a fuel tight panel, asnd a drain
outside,
but I would rather have it open so I can see when the leak first occurs..

Fly Safe - Have Fun

Harry
.

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to