IMHO, Type Rating A&Ps is a very bad idea. If the FAA likes that idea,
they will require it. Then, unpopular and orphan planes will have very
few qualified A&Ps available. How would it be if there were only a
handful of Ercoupe-qualified A&Ps in the entire country? Would you get a
ferry permit and fly hundreds of miles to get certain repairs done (as
well as paying more)?

IMHO, coupes are very easy to repair and inspect. The published
checklists I've read don't contain anything that isn't done on many
other aircraft and the parts used are similar as well. While there are
some portions of the aircraft not completely illustrated in the parts
books, AC43.13 seems to cover those instances. I also would not want to
have some of the folklore I've read about coupes in "Coupe Capers" or
this mail reflector codified into law that I am required to follow.

Except for the well-meaning proposal to improve documentation, I'm not
sure anything else I've heard is more than a means to pay less for
maintenance by doing-it-yourself. Unfortunately, the cost of good
documentation will be far beyond anything most people will pay - how
many requests are there to this list that the requester could have
gotten from the $30 worth of books he should have already purchased?
This proposal will result in a lot of junk flying around and ultimately
higher costs for the certified aircraft remaining.

David 
N6359V

Ed Burkhead wrote:
> 
> In our proposal, we think the planes would remain fully certificated --
they
> would be worked upon by people with FAA approved certificates, either
Pilot
> Type Specific Maintainer or Type Rated A&P.
> 
> I'm doubtful that I'd be willing to take my plane non-certified.
__________________________________________________________________________
______
To unsubscribe from this list please send
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________________________________
T O P I C A  The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to