Le 08/02/2006 à 21:57:35+0100, Ralf Hildebrandt a écrit > > Better at what?
Don't troll ;-))) > > > because (this is what I understand but I never use it) it's easy to > > split physicaly the smtp (with anti-virus/anti-spam/etc...) server and > > the imap server. > > Hmm, I don't see an advantage here. The advantage is in this configuration we don't need huge server to server both of anti-virus/anti-spam (basicaly write in perl, need lot of resource) and imap/pop server. > > > And between the smtp server and the imap server we can use LSMTP (L for > > Ligth) protocol. The difference between LSMTP and SMTP is the first is > > very light and more faster than SMTP. > > That's not true. There's almost NO difference between LMTP and SMTP (in > Postfix, the lmtp and smtp deamon are implemented by the same program). Well, the fact is in LSMTP (This is not LMTP=Local Mail... and LSMTP=Light SMTP) there are not any verification the mail is just delivery. And the purpose of LSMTP is for splitting the SMTP server and the IMAP server. But I'm not specialist for this, maybe I just drunk too much ;-)) Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Wed Feb 8 22:00:08 CET 2006 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Courier-imap mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-imap
