Tim Hosking writes: > on 28/11/01 5:47 pm, Sam Varshavchik at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Tim Hosking writes: >> >>> Actually I'm not. The enclosed message was rejected by 0.36 until I modified >>> submit2.C. The reason given was that it had 8 bit content without the >>> required MIME headers. Quite honestly I'm baffled. >> >> I had no problems delivering this message to a local mailbox. >> >> [mrsam@ny tmp]$ sum -r 8bit.txt >> 00364 3 >> [mrsam@ny tmp]$ sum -s 8bit.txt >> 57436 5 8bit.txt >> >> Are your checksums the same? > > Identical. Of course, this message is the one that was accepted after > modified submit2.C - I never got to capture the rejected messages. I have > been working on the assumption that as the message was generated by the same > mailer, i.e. a resend then it should be to all intents and purposes > identical to the original rejected message - except for dates, message Ids > and such. > > Is their any way to get Courier to save rejected messages in a directory so > that I can examine them properly?
Nope. I do see some corruption in the Subject: header. Looks like NSI's mailer is crap and inserts random garbage into the Subject: header. -- Sam _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
