Juha Saarinen wrote: > > I've found the combination of Exim as the MTA and Courier-IMAP + SqWebmail > very good indeed. Exim is very flexible and much easier to configure than > Sendmail, and Courier-IMAP and SqWebmail just work... can't ask for more > than that. ;-)
I second that, Juha. I run several Debian based systems in production environment, and it have Exim installed by default. I have over the time never found a good reason to use another mta. Having struggled with uwash imapd for many years, I was very pleased to find out about courier-imap. With better design and much cleaner codebase, I took it to my heart ;) The headaches of doing incremental backup of big mailboxes (I mean BIG) is gone thanks to the use of maildir. I use reiserfs for mail store to avoid the inode starvation problem. By using the builtin support for LDAP in both exim and courier-imap, I have managed to create a true virtual mail system (no local configuration change needed). I'm a happy administrator, thank you Sam! I follow the development of courier-mta closely, and will switch when I find it better than Exim. I like Sam's coding style, which for me is an important quality factor. Regards, Tomas _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
