On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:03:18AM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-02-03 13:42:24 +0000: > > As far as I can determine <@> is not a valid RFC2822 address, yet > > Courier uses it on outgoing error messages. Am I missing something in > > one of the myriad mail RFCs that defines this usage? Sam? Anybody? > > see RFC 2821 sections 3.7 and 4.5.5
Neither of those sections answers the question. Double-bounces aren't normally delivered, but they might get delivered to the local postmaster, in which case you really ought to put a valid RFC2822 address on them. What does Courier MTA do with single-bounce messages? If they have a valid header, such as "From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]", I see no reason why you can't use that for double-bounces too. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
