Sam Varshavchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Julian Mehnle writes: > > Sam Varshavchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Julian Mehnle writes: > > > > What's wrong with sender rewriting? I mean, except for that it > > > > has to be implemented? > > > > > > What exactly are you going to rewrite the sender to? The address > > > from which the message gets forwarded? > > > > > > Gee, guess where the bounce would go? > > > > The bounce would go to the forwarder. So what? The forwarder can > > simply forward (backward) the bounce as well. Is this a serious > > problem? > > Yes. Because the bounce bounces (after all, everything to the forwarded > address gets bounced, right?), and since the return address is reset to > the forwarder, it go back to the forwarder. > > But, by definition, the forwarder forwards all mail, resetting the > return address. So the bounce gets forwarded again, it bounces, goes > back, forwards, bounces again, etcâ
I don't see the problem. http://spf.pobox.com/objections.html#forwarding handles it, I think. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78&alloc_id371&op=click _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
