> Explain me your ideology here...it is either a CORRECT one or NOT. It doesn't matter if any of them are incorrect/broken. It only matters if *all* of them are. Just as you shouldn't refuse to access foo.bar.com because an A record for zap.bar.com is malformed, you shouldn't refuse to try the 7th MX for bar.com because the 3rd one is malformed.
> Now if you want the acceptance of broken MX records are being > legitimate DNS > entries by the internet community then I refer this again > RFC 2926 What does 2926 have at all to do with MX records? ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
