> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Roger
> B.A. Klorese
> Sent: January 21, 2004 4:21 PM
> To: 'Sam Varshavchik'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [courier-users] Re: RFC 1035 error V.S. First two MX
> entries BAD for domain
>
>
> > And I'll make a case that broken DNS records are a sign of an
> > incompetently-administered ISP, and that it's been
> > historically shown that
> > incompetently-administered ISPs typically have other
> > problems, such as open
> > relays and hacked proxies, and zombies.
>
> Great -- now we have *software* that wages preemptive war.

It took me a while Roger, but I've come to agree (with the occasional client
inspired nagging doubt). A solid product that works and follows the rules vs.
one that accepts anything remotely appropriate thrown at it and muddles through.
The problem here, is not courier, but that people got used to sendmail and
others that were too permissive and allowed people to get sloppy in their
structure. How much work should one do to allow others to be sloppy?

General statement - not meant to directly slam anyone.

m/



-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users

Reply via email to