> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Roger > B.A. Klorese > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 8:02 PM > To: Mitch (WebCob) > Cc: 'Sam Varshavchik'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [courier-users] Re: RFC 1035 error V.S. First two MX > entries BAD for domain > > > "Accept liberally" should still be the watchword for anything not > constituting an attack pathway. >
I sort of agree with this - so does Sam - hence the ability to accept badly formatted mime messages - But this isn't accept - this is sending. Should courier waste cycles confirming the complete DNS structure of a domain? no I don't think so... Should it try a second delivery if it can't contact primary MX - yes that's standard Should it try to exhaust all possiblities just in case one of the records turns out to be usable when the rest are crap? Why should I waste my processor time helping someone else evade spam through confusion? (Even if this works, it slows everyone else down). m/ ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
