> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 12:47 AM

> Julian Mehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's exactly what I meant.  *Mounting* the license plate 
> > on the roof 
> > is bad, but *looking* for the license plate on the roof isn't -- if 
> > it's not significantly more effort.
> 
> If it looks like a license plate it must be a license plate, 
> huh?  What happens if it looks like a license plate on the 
> side, but it's different from what looks like a license plate 
> on the other side?  How far should you go to appease people 
> who gratuitously fail to follow the mandated standard?

There are two distinct issues here: partially and totally incorrect DNS
entries.

If the totality of the MX records for a given domain contain the (invalid)
IP addresses, then there is strong argument against having the resolver try
to guess the correct lookup for a numeric domain name (i.e that the IP
address for "192.1.2.3." is 192.1.2.3).  The argument that there is no
numeric TLD is unconvincing, since no other part of the resolver has a clue
what is, or is not, a valid domain -- that's the province of the root
servers.

However, there *is* a case to be made that *if* one MX record fails to
resolve (for any reason) the next should be tried.  And in this scenario, is
there a significant difference between failure because of well-formed but
missing "A" records and ill-formed ones like an apparently random strings of
decimal digits?

I don't have the answer... But I do think the analogy is getting a bit
strained!

Regards,

Malc.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. 
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users

Reply via email to