Lloyd Zusman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Well, I agree with you that adding the "Mail::" prefix will make things > too long and cumbersome. But if the CPAN folks disagree, what can we > do? > > As much as I am in favor of keeping the "Courier::Filter" name, I'd > rather see the package in CPAN than to have it be absent just because of > not wanting to rename it.
Well, C:F already is on CPAN: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Courier-Filter/ It just isn't in the official module list, and thus is not listed in the CPAN module directory. But we could very well leave it that way if we deem keeping the current name more important. The modlist maintainers have already made the final decision that "Courier::Filter" is too generic, so to convince them otherwise I'd probably have to show them independently gathered representative statistics showing that most software developers on earth think they're wrong. ;-) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. >From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
