Selon Alessandro Vesely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Pardon me for jumping into this thread,
It's a role of a discussion's list, isn't it ;-) > IME, it is better if the gateway stores PDF attachments on a secure web > site where they can be retrieved on a per-user basis. Then it will only > send to users notices including those web pointers. The rationale is that > besides wrong email addresses, you'll have to cope with wrong recipients, > dummy spam filters, users unwillingly deleting messages, etcetera. Thus, > you'll have to provide such kind of retrieval anyway. >From my point of view, it is a bad idea. Typically, in my company, internet access is restricted to people... They must sign an agreement with their blood :-) Companies such as airports, army and so on oftently apply some hard rules. (my clients are this kind of people) Providing a web "repository" would mean that people have HTTP access... What is not the case in several cases. More over, we would have to implement an authentication method updated with SAP database. On simpler systems, I think your idea can improve service's quality. > > If this gateway provides me the full original message in the DSN, I will > > be able to resend it (with outlook, I can do Actions ==> Resend). So I > > only catch failures, and I can process only "interesting" mails... As > > this is often typos, I can correct them by myself... (it's crasy the > > number of people who scrambles their fingers :-) ) > > Courier's default behavior is to do exactly that. To quote: "By default, > the entire message is only included in non-delivery notices (failures)." > http://www.courier-mta.org/courier.html OK, I have to check dsnlimit, it's certainly the parameter I missed. Each time I saw courier giving me headers only, mails were bigger than 32K I love this webpage, I should bookmark it :-) > I suspect SAP explicitly requires headers-only for the reasons you stated > above. Forcing a different behavior in that case would be non-standard. SAP does not create the "mail from: " header, it's Adobe Output Designer which do it here. RFC 3461 is 3 years old, apparently, adobe output designer is older than that... The last time I patched it, it was to comply to RFC 822 :-/ Thank your for your mail, it's always interesting to share ideas ;-) Best regards. Jerome Blion. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
