On 5.9.2008 17:45, Tim Lyth wrote: > I'm tempted to dig through the SA config file to edit the weighting for > the SPF_PASS test, but I'm concerned that this may lead to > false-negatives for genuine spam. > > What do people recommend I do? > Well, considering that SPF is not a anti-spam technique, I don't think you should give any more leeway for the messages that pass SPF test.
To rephrase: passing or not passing SPF test doesn't say anything about the spammyness of the message. It only tells if the message is coming where it is supposed to come from. esa ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
