Art Sackett a écrit :
On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 01:45:13AM +1000, Tim Lyth wrote:
I'm tempted to dig through the SA config file to edit the weighting for
the SPF_PASS test, but I'm concerned that this may lead to
false-negatives for genuine spam.
Myself, if I were using SA instead of DSPAM: I'd use Courier's built-in
SPF tests to reject those messages that outright fail the SPF tests,
then go ahead and reconfigure SA to give credence to the SPF test
results
eg: some AOL mail servers are not registered in the SPF field of aol.com.
More over, when using mailing lists, it's a bad idea to reject any mail
with a failed SPF check.
HTH
Jerome Blion.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
