Tim Lyth wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My wife has complained that a number of genuine (advertising) email have
> been classified as spam by SA, yet they have SPF_PASS in the list of
> tests run against the email. Unfortunately, SPF_PASS is given 0.0
> weighting by SA and therefore the emails are being classified as spam.
no, there's no therefore here. the message was classified as spam
because it matched many SA rules.
>
> I'm tempted to dig through the SA config file to edit the weighting for
> the SPF_PASS test, but I'm concerned that this may lead to
> false-negatives for genuine spam.
>
> What do people recommend I do?
>
forget about SPF. find out what made SA think it is spam (the X-Spam-
headers will tell you). But more importantly, use the
spamassassin-users mailing list
for such issues.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
