I have similar concerns, and hate every forum I'd used until I saw how Zoho
was implemented for jQuery.

http://forum.jquery.com/#AllForums

Imagine landing on this, but for coworking, instead of landing on the
coworking google group's landing page. I think this is worlds clearer than
how to participate in an e-mail list, but would love others' feedback too.

That biforcation is also a concern, but lets be honest, at the size we're
at, it happens already...we just don't see the effect because people split
off into their own side-converations. I think that guiding the fragmentation
of a list this big is MUCH better than letting it happen totally on its
own...and taking people/conversations along with it.

Great feedback, John. Much appreciated.

/ah
indyhall.org
coworking in philadelphia


On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:46 PM, John Sechrest <[email protected]> wrote:

> The difference between mailing lists and forums is much more complex and
> much more subtle that you are outlining here.
>
> I have seen several efforts to move to forums blow up discussions. In
> addition, I have also seen moves like this end up translating into a
> biforcation of the conversation into two different groups.
>
> The choice of how you view data is a critical one. And I totally agree
> about the need for a tool that helps you focus your attention well. For me,
> google groups + gmail does this well.
>
> In general, I have yet to meet a forum that I like. Web based forums hide
> information and make it harder for me to find things. I find this especially
> true of forum sites like NING. (pet peave)
>
> I do not know how zoho forums work, having never used them.
>
> For me, I am immediately suspicious when I see the word forum. Since forums
> usually take me more time to process, take more energy to keep in context.
>
> I suspect it is an information processing style issue, since these are the
> very issues you are trying to address.
>
> I would just urge caution. A shift like this from google groups to zoho
> forums is likely to quietly and subtly alter who is participating, and who
> stays connected to the group.
>
> I have watched other groups have a significant shift of membership with
> tool changes like this.
>
> Be sure you are getting what you think you are getting. And be sure you
> know which audience you are serving with the change.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Alex Hillman <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
>> So, Woody just suggested that an active thread be moved out of the main
>> channel so as to not disrupt others. While I think it was a good topic to
>> keep in the group's visibility, his question of "can I move this to a sub
>> folder" reminded me of something.
>>
>> Google Groups kinda sucks.
>>
>> To be fair, it's become our home. This is the most active repository of
>> information for coworking, and the place where I send people first to learn
>> more and meet more coworking people. But the Google Group is anything but
>> good for discovery. Spam moderation is chaos for the people who actively
>> manage it. The lack of sub-threads is annoying, and the lack of message
>> context makes it hard to know what messages to pay attention to.
>>
>> Recently, the open source javascript library jQuery moved away from Google
>> Groups for a lot of these same reasons...to Zoho forums.
>>
>> I did some research and found that a Zoho forum to support our group would
>> cost $75/month, and incur a one-time $500 fee to migrate all of the existing
>> data (messages, threads, and even users) from Google Groups to Zoho. There's
>> even an option to interact with Zoho via e-mail for those of us that like
>> this.
>>
>> The pros:
>>
>>    - Much better organization of our knowledge. The ability to set
>>    message "topics" to things like "question", "introduction", "idea" would 
>> be
>>    HUGE for this group.
>>    - Easier on-boarding for new members
>>    - Better spam moderation tools
>>
>> The cons:
>>
>>    - It's not free
>>    - Since it's not free, somebody needs to pay for it, which means
>>    somebody is ultimately a "keyholder"
>>
>> The cons aren't huge, but they do need to be addressed.
>>
>> I think this could be a very valuable evolution of this discussion forum
>> that we all love so much. What say you, the coworking group?
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> /ah
>> indyhall.org
>> coworking in philadelphia
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Coworking" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<coworking%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> John Sechrest          .
> Corvallis Benton        .
>    Chamber Coalition      .
>       420 NW 2nd                   .
>              (541) 757-1507              . [email protected]
>
>                                                                      .
>
>
>        .
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Coworking" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<coworking%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Coworking" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.

Reply via email to