> You mean a list like:
>
> http://stats.cpantesters.org/wpcent.html
>

I think not.  I think that list shows recent popular failures. What I
want: for example, imagine a module does great web scraping when it is
released, then the pages change and the scraper fails, and the
well-written tests fail, but the author does not respond.  After the
initial spurt of testing on the module release with passes, only a few
fails might later trickle in for a profoundly broken module, by its
own admission.  It would be nice to look at detailed information about
1 module and be able to assess its "freshness" in passing or failing,
rather than go to another web page and search to see if the module I
need is "stale".   I think authors might more follow their own modules
than a global "fail" page.

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Barbie <bar...@missbarbell.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 08:34:52AM -0500, M W487 wrote:
>> I tend to agree with all your points, but want to encourage more discussion.
>>
>> 2010/1/19 Burak Gürsoy <burakgur...@gmx.net>:
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Nigel Horne [mailto:n...@bandsman.co.uk]
>> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 12:23 PM
>> >> To: cpan-testers-discuss@perl.org
>> >> Subject: Unsupported CPAN Modules
>> >
>> >> a) Users should be warned when attempting to download/install
>> >
>> > Bad idea. Some Catalyst fanboi is spamming CPAN Ratings for similar 
>> > reasons.
>>
>> "warn" does sound like overkill.
>>
>> but imagine if a distribution fails its own test suite on all
>> platforms tested for a year or more, or some other criteria.
>>
>> Then it might be nice to make such knowledge more known.  If the
>> author is looking, they will see it.  If the naive are looking, they
>> will see it.
>
> You mean a list like:
>
> http://stats.cpantesters.org/wpcent.html
>
> :)
>
>> >> This could also raise the profile of cpan-testers.
>> >>
>> >> -Nigel
>>
>> I support the cpan-testers profile being raised in a positive way.
>
> Me too, but I'm not so convince sending emails, above and beyond what I
> already send via the Daily Summaries is the right answer.
>
> Cheers,
> Barbie.
> --
> Birmingham Perl Mongers <http://birmingham.pm.org>
> Memoirs Of A Roadie <http://barbie.missbarbell.co.uk>
> CPAN Testers Blog <http://blog.cpantesters.org>
> YAPC Conference Surveys <http://yapc-surveys.org>
>
>
>

Reply via email to