On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 08:45:27PM +0200, E. Choroba wrote: > I've just noticed one of my distribution failed in 5.28.1. When examining > the report, I found it failed under "strict hashpairs". I had no idea what > it was, so I Googled - and found it's a cperl thing. Reading the report > carefully I noticed it was indeed generated by cperl. See > http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/0de93324-8933-11e9-9997-9db8de51d2a1 > > I have no problem with cperl smoking CPAN, but I'm not sure it's a good > idea to include its results among normal Perl versions. What do you think?
FWIW I'd quite like to get notifications when my code fails on cperl even if those test results should probably be excluded from aggregates like the number of passes/fails. There's a lot to like about cperl. -- David Cantrell | Cake Smuggler Extraordinaire Your call is important to me. To see if it's important to you I'm going to make you wait on hold for five minutes. All calls are recorded for blackmail and amusement purposes.
