> On Jun 11, 2019, at 5:56 AM, David Cantrell <da...@cantrell.org.uk> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 08:45:27PM +0200, E. Choroba wrote: > >> I've just noticed one of my distribution failed in 5.28.1. When examining >> the report, I found it failed under "strict hashpairs". I had no idea what >> it was, so I Googled - and found it's a cperl thing. Reading the report >> carefully I noticed it was indeed generated by cperl. See >> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/0de93324-8933-11e9-9997-9db8de51d2a1 >> >> I have no problem with cperl smoking CPAN, but I'm not sure it's a good >> idea to include its results among normal Perl versions. What do you think? > > FWIW I'd quite like to get notifications when my code fails on cperl > even if those test results should probably be excluded from aggregates > like the number of passes/fails. There's a lot to like about cperl.
Likewise. -F
