Stefane Fermigier wrote: > Alain Duchamp wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>I've been working on a Plone project (for a 800 users intranet) for >>several months but it's going nowhere. For instance, we have big >>problems with performance, big problems with GRUF, and upgrades are a >>nightmare. >> >>Do you believe we would have less troubles with CPS ? > > > I believe we would need more details about your troubles. > > Regarding CPS performances, I think there were some benchmarks showing > that CPS was faster, especially in high volume situations.
I still don't have these information (which are only meaningful ones for real projects), but on a stock CPS3 full vs Plone 2.1.1. I have: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ab -n 10 http://localhost:8080/cps This is ApacheBench, Version 2.0.41-dev <$Revision: 1.141 $> apache-2.0 Copyright (c) 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/ Copyright (c) 1998-2002 The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/ Benchmarking localhost (be patient).....done Server Software: Zope/(Zope Server Hostname: localhost Server Port: 8080 Document Path: /cps Document Length: 15160 bytes Concurrency Level: 1 Time taken for tests: 0.944122 seconds Complete requests: 10 Failed requests: 0 Write errors: 0 Total transferred: 153790 bytes HTML transferred: 151600 bytes Requests per second: 10.59 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 94.412 [ms] (mean) Time per request: 94.412 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests) Transfer rate: 158.88 [Kbytes/sec] received Connection Times (ms) min mean[+/-sd] median max Connect: 0 0 0.0 0 0 Processing: 92 93 2.5 94 100 Waiting: 91 92 2.5 93 99 Total: 92 93 2.5 94 100 Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) 50% 94 66% 94 75% 94 80% 94 90% 100 95% 100 98% 100 99% 100 100% 100 (longest request) vs. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ab -n 10 http://localhost:8081/plone This is ApacheBench, Version 2.0.41-dev <$Revision: 1.141 $> apache-2.0 Copyright (c) 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/ Copyright (c) 1998-2002 The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/ Benchmarking localhost (be patient).....done Server Software: Zope/(Zope Server Hostname: localhost Server Port: 8081 Document Path: /plone Document Length: 27162 bytes Concurrency Level: 1 Time taken for tests: 2.34970 seconds Complete requests: 10 Failed requests: 0 Write errors: 0 Total transferred: 274410 bytes HTML transferred: 271620 bytes Requests per second: 4.91 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 203.497 [ms] (mean) Time per request: 203.497 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests) Transfer rate: 131.21 [Kbytes/sec] received Connection Times (ms) min mean[+/-sd] median max Connect: 0 0 0.0 0 0 Processing: 199 202 3.8 203 212 Waiting: 198 201 3.8 202 211 Total: 199 202 3.8 203 212 Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) 50% 203 66% 203 75% 204 80% 205 90% 212 95% 212 98% 212 99% 212 100% 212 (longest request) So basically CPS is twice as fast as Plone on empty sites. I've also been told that, because of the way they are using the Catalog for storing the navigation, that doesn't scale well either. S. -- Stéfane Fermigier, Tel: +33 (0)6 63 04 12 77 (mobile). Nuxeo Collaborative Portal Server: http://www.nuxeo.com/cps Gestion de contenu web / portail collaboratif / groupware / open source! _______________________________________________ cps-devel mailing list http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/cps-devel
