Stefane Fermigier wrote:
Stefane Fermigier wrote:
Alain Duchamp wrote:
Hi,
I've been working on a Plone project (for a 800 users intranet) for
several months but it's going nowhere. For instance, we have big
problems with performance, big problems with GRUF, and upgrades are a
nightmare.
Do you believe we would have less troubles with CPS ?
I believe we would need more details about your troubles.
Regarding CPS performances, I think there were some benchmarks showing
that CPS was faster, especially in high volume situations.
I still don't have these information (which are only meaningful ones for
real projects), but on a stock CPS3 full vs Plone 2.1.1. I have:
The important aspect I think is that the portlet cache allows to add
many portlets on a page (10 .. 20) without experiencing the scalability
issues you'd see otherwise on heavy loaded sites (high CPU load, read
conflict errors, etc...) Also the portlets use its own catalog, so even
if there are hundreds of thousands of documents, it won't really affect
page rendering. When it comes to site navigation, the CPS tree cache is
better optimized also than the zope catalog (which was not really
designed for caching tree structures).
/JM
_______________________________________________
cps-devel mailing list
http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/cps-devel
