Hi Mario,

Mario Olimpio de Menezes wrote:
>    I'm running Zope behind Apache2 using rewrite rules.
>    The host machine has a valid name within the LAN (local DNS).
>     There're other sites hosted in this machine (ILIAS - Distance Education, 
> DotProject - Project Management and some other utilities, like phpLDAPadmin 
> and phpMysqlAdmin).
>     Zope is running on port 9673 (Debian Stable). The hardware is pretty 
> basic 
> - P4 2.8MHz 512KB L2, 256MB Ram, IDE disk 7200 rpm Seagate Ultra ATA/100.

256 Mb..... really ??? with other sites stuffs running at the same time...

For info, when we are putting CPS instances in production it's the
configuration looks like more dedicated nodes with 2GB RAM on dual core
... and we got several of them running in cluster with ZEO... I don't
know what's your expectation about the performances but clearly you
won't meet high ones with 256 and a shared app ones... (I got 1Gb RAM on
my laptop ...)

>     Using ab (Apache Benchmarking utility) I can get ~ 430.73 requests per 
> second when accessing the front page of Ilias3 - this is a simple login page.
>     Using ab, I can't get more than 5 requests per second when accessing CPS 
> login page through Apache2 Rewrite Rules.
>     The rewrite rule I'm using is:
[...]
>      I need some hints (or even examples) on how to improve CPS (Zope + 
> Apache2) performance. This is critical; I can't use the present setup as a 
> production site - it's worst than poor!
> 

Install ZopeProfiler to detect what you can optimize at application level.
http://www.dieter.handshake.de/pyprojects/zope/

        J.

P.S : Tell me you don't have 256Mb on your node :)

-- 
Julien Anguenot | Nuxeo R&D (Paris, France)
CPS Platform : http://www.cps-project.org
Zope3 / ECM   : http://www.z3lab.org
mail: anguenot at nuxeo.com; tel: +33 (0) 6 72 57 57 66

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
cps-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/cps-users

Reply via email to